Upcoming Classes

Search CFLA's Article Archive:

ACLU Sues Morgan Stanley for Bias in Mortgage Business

chicagotribune.comOct 15, 2012

By Jed Horowitz

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The American Civil Liberties Union sued Morgan Stanley on Monday, alleging racial discrimination over packaging subprime mortgage loans into securities.

The suit is the first to directly accuse an investment bank, rather than a lender, of helping to make risky loans that violate federal civil rights laws, the group said at a news conference.

Morgan Stanley encouraged a unit of now-bankrupt New Century Financial Corp to disproportionately target black borrowers with overpriced loans that had a strong possibility of going sour, the suit alleges. The investment bank received significant fees from packaging the loans into securities that were sold to institutional investors, while the borrowers faced high risks of default, the ACLU said.

If successful, the lawsuit could inhibit the lucrative process known as securitization that has long lubricated Wall Street profits but that was sidelined until recently by the financial crisis.

The National Consumer Law Center, which helped prepare the suit, hopes to amass evidence against other Wall Street firms, said Stuart Rossman, the group's director of litigation. Morgan Stanley was chosen because evidence gleaned from earlier probes of New Century's practices implicated the investment bank, he said.

Thomas Deutsch, executive director of the American Securitization Forum, a trade group, declined to comment on the suit.

"It is literally the first case of Main Street holding Wall Street accountable" for the financial crisis that led millions of Americans to lose their homes and that devastated the U.S. economy, ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said at a news conference.

Morgan Stanley rejected the accusations. "We believe these allegations are completely without merit and plan to defend ourselves vigorously," spokeswoman Mary Claire Delaney said in an email.

The complaint was filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on behalf of five Detroit residents. It alleges that Morgan Stanley went beyond the traditional securitization role of an investment bank by helping to fund loans made by New Century, setting loan volume goals and establishing terms of the loans.

The ACLU asked the court to certify the case as a class action. It said as many as 6,000 black homeowners in the Detroit area may have suffered similar discrimination as a result of being offered loans that many could not afford.

The alleged practice is a twist on claims that banks engaged in "red-lining," or refusing to provide loans and other services in low-income areas.

"It's reverse red-lining. It violates the Fair Housing Act," said Elizabeth Cabraser, a co-counsel for the plaintiffs. "These loans were mass-produced and they were built to order, not to serve homeowners."

Discriminatory practices connected to the securitization process were endemic during the last decade throughout the financial services industry and across the nation, the ACLU said.

Critics of securitization say the process of packaging loans into securities encourages recklessness in bank credit policies because banks do not hold the loans they originate.

Advocates say that by removing loans from the balance sheets of banks, securitization allows banks to make more loans and stimulate the economy.

Trillions of dollars of mortgage, credit card, automobile and other consumer loans have been securitized and sold to investors. Many of the home loans bought by the banks are insured by agencies such as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp, or Freddie Mac, and the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae.

Some lawyers and economists who work with the securities industry described the lawsuit as "novel" because investment banks are several steps removed from loan origination. Morgan Stanley was chosen because it is among the few remaining "deep pockets" in the financial industry now that so many direct subprime lenders have been shut down, they said.

Anticipating an argument that the statute of limitations has passed for actions leading up to the financial crisis, the suit says Morgan Stanley's concealment of its role in the loan process and its deviation from "true underwriting standards" for the loans it purchased invalidate any legal deadlines.

Many Recent Lawsuits

The ACLU lawsuit follows a spate of new litigation against Wall Street by U.S. federal and state authorities over banks' roles in triggering the financial crisis that began more than four years ago.

JPMorgan Chase & Co was sued last week by New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman for alleged subprime mortgage abuses at an investment bank that it purchased during the financial crisis. [ID:nL1E8L2L6Y] The U.S. attorney in Manhattan filed fraud charges against Wells Fargo & Co two weeks ago for a "reckless pattern" of making questionable home loans that allegedly cost the government hundreds of millions of dollars in insurance settlements. [ID:nL1E8LCLEU]

Massachusetts earlier sued Morgan Stanley for securitizing home loans, alleging violations of a state consumer protection law. The ACLU said that case did not address the issue nationwide nor link the alleged abusive practices to discriminatory policy.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include five borrowers and Michigan Legal Services.

Rubbie McCoy, a municipal swimming teacher in Detroit and one of the plaintiffs, said at the news conference that New Century pressured her to take out a loan that is now higher than the value of the home she purchased.

"In the past 12 months I've been under an enormous amount of stress trying to shield the mortgage situation from my children," she said, choking on tears. "I don't quite understand the situation myself."

The case is Beverly Adkins et al v Morgan Stanley, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 12-7667.

(Reporting by Jed Horowitz, additional reporting by Emily Flitter; Editing by Martha Graybow, Maureen Bavdek, Tim Dobbyn, David Gregorio and Matthew Lewis)

Back to October 2012 Archive

CFLA was founded by the Nation's Leading Foreclosure Defense Attorneys back in 2007 to serve the Foreclosure Defense Industry and fight pervasive Bank Fraud. Since opening our virtual doors, CFLA has rapidly expanded to become the premier online legal destination for small businesses and consumers. But as the company continues to grow, we're careful to hold true to our original vision. For us, putting the law within reach of millions of people is more than just a novel idea—it's the founding principle, just ask Andrew P. Lehman, J.D.. With convenient locations in Houston and Los Angeles, you can contact Our National Account Specialist and General Manager / Member Damion W. Emholtz at 888-758-2352 for a free Mortgage Fraud Analysis or to obtain samples of work product, including cutting edge Bloomberg Securitization Audits, Litigation Support, Quiet Title Packages, and for more information about our Nationally Accredited and U.S. Department of Education Approved "Mortgage Securitization Analyst Training Certification" Classes (3 days) 24 hours for approved CLE & MCLE Credit (Now Available Online).

SEE BELOW- http://www.certifiedforensicloanauditors.com

Call us toll free at 888-758-2352

Bookmark and Share
Facebook Like us on Facebook
Twitter Follow us on Twitter
YouTube View our YouTube Videos
LinkedIn Connect to us on Linkedin
BBB Logo


Contact us or view our Sample Documents & Audits by completing the form below.

  • Reload
  • Should be Empty:


DVD Sets Only $99


FREE Mortgage Fraud Analysis


Order Cutting-Edge Services Now


Quiet Title Packages from Licensed Attorneys


Affiliate Services


CFLA Sponsored Attorney Links


Take-Home Education Package